Author Archives: André Natta

Big dreams can hurt sometimes

I am always one for dreaming big dreams; it’s what leads to the development of great cities. After all I’m from a city where dreams are encouraged and sometimes fulfilled. That being said, I am still dumbfounded by people who are convinced that the future of Birmingham lies in the construction of a new Birmingham “Megaplex” outside of the city center. Rep. John Rogers hand Waymaker Properties made an announcement about the proposal yesterday according to this report in The Birmingham News.

This is not to say that the rumored locations would be bad. Despite the fact that no one will say where this might be located, conventional wisdom says that one proposed location would be near the Birmingham Race Course (close to Trussville) with another of the potential spots being in Ensley. In both cases, the redevelopment of the area would bring many good things and few negatives to the surrounding area as well as the county and state. But is there really cooperation taking place or is it some chest beating to show who has the bigger ego?

One of the things that is consistently pointed out by outsiders and locals alike is the lack of cooperation among our elected officials and the nonexistence of a cohesive plan for the future (at least a shared one). It simply baffles the mind why with all of the announced development plans for our city center, whether it’s the various hotels and businesses being lured in, plans for an entertainment district near our existing civic center facility or movements throughout the city to bring new life to our older commercial districts that we are still obsessed with reckless expansion. It is particularly disheartening when you constantly hear commercials asking us to “do your share for cleaner air” while we, at times intentionally, encourage more automotive use in our region. It’s even more disturbing that instead focusing on regional development we see everyone worrying about their tiny little kingdoms (sorry Anne) and commercials about moving your business to Moody playing within the metro area rather than outside of it.

Legion Field is about to host a professional franchise for the first time in a long time this spring. We are seeing people take leaps of faith all over the city, whether it’s new business ventures downtown in Birmingham, or Ensley. There are endless developments taking place around the region, whether it’s in Calera or Trussville, Hoover or Bessemer. While people may be proud of being separate, it will actually hurt us in the long run as the area’s sprawl will only make our traffic become more of an issue, similar to the parking lots that exist during rush hour in Charlotte in Atlanta.

Rather than take away from some of the beacons of opportunity that are happening, we need to be moving to support them more. Are there not more important things to focus investment dollars on like actually getting on the same page to expand and restore our existing convention facilities downtown and generate the energy and excitement necessary to lift the region to its ever growing potential? We can use our tax dollars to fix our transit issues or improve portions of our educational systems in a real way instead of worrying about who’s going to steal a business from someone else. Part of this is due to the reliance on sales taxes to provide services (but that’s another for another time).

If we are to shake our moniker of being The City of Perpetual Promise, perhaps the egos need to be checked at the door and the good of the region, the entire region, need to be considered. Let’s keep the excitement going where it needs to be instead of creating it somewhere else just because you don’t like the way the game is being played so you want to take your ball and play somewhere else.

Lead, Birmingham

People are waiting for a savior in Birmingham. This savior must be able to pick up every piece of trash off of the streets, keep grass along the streets cut and in pristine condition and be able to renovate every building in town that needs it. They’ve also got to be able to stop the bickering in City Hall. Completely.

People are waiting for someone to lead the city to its position of prominence that many feel it deserves. The people are waiting, and waiting, and waiting.

I learned a quote during my first month of college that remains extremely important to me today:

“Leadership is action, not position.”

I’ve been thinking about this quote recently as things seem to be in flux around me. Part of this upcoming election will determine the type of leader we want. A leader that talks a good game is fine, but the real question should be “What will they be able to deliver?”

That leader must also be able to engage the population in able to deliver. This is whether you’re the leader of our city, a leader in an organization or church or just “someone” that wants to see something happen. While a leader may be able to help cheer the people on and use the bully pulpit, nothing will happen until the people that she or he represents take a larger role in the redevelopment of our city.

At issue is whether or not we are willing to take the action necessary to move our city forward or do we continue to wait for the knight in shining armor.

We as a city cannot continue to wait for it to happen. If it’s going to happen, we need to do it. It’s as simple as picking up a piece of garbage, not throwing a cup out of your window when you’re driving down the street and maybe becoming the real eyes and ears of the city again.

There are times when the village that is supposed to raise a child should be able to raise a phoenix from the ashes of discontent and perpetual promise. It’s time for this village to fully undertake their role.

Is it really all about the “dome”?

Editor’s note: Originally posted on Dre’s Ramblings on March 23, I felt that it was pertinent to post again, especially with the recent talk about the entertainment district and the BJCC expansion. Let us know what you think by posting a comment at the end of this posting.

The numerous online forums here in town are always interesting to click through, especially when there is a hot button issue dominating the boards. In recent weeks, the issue in question is the expansion of the BJCC and the development of an entertainment district for the convention center district by Performa Entertainment Real Estate, Inc.

The development of the entertainment district is a no-brainer; locating such an attraction near Malfunction Junction provides visibility near one of the busiest intersections for interstate traffic in the Southeastern United States. The area’s redevelopment will most likely generate additional revenue for the city and the county through encouraging passersby to stop and take a moment to find out just what’s happening around town.

The more interesting debate among those that take place in the forums is the one about the expansion of the BJCC. Everyone points to all of these reasons why the expansion must include a 70,000 seat “dome” and not a 40,000 seat “arena”. In a city that is quick to point out how quickly something is out of date and needs to be replaced, maybe the real issue is whether or not the current situation is really broken. Maybe it’s also a case of deciding whether political grandstanding in an election year will keep us from exploring the possibility of doing what is truly best for the city and the region. Continue reading

Our plans for the 2007 mayor's race

NOTE: You can check out our election coverage over at Election ’07

The first “serious” poll that we ran focused on what should be one of the major issues in the city of Birmingham as it continues to move forward at the beginning of the 21st century : The 2007 mayoral election.

I wanted to see if anyone would say anything or if people even cared.

I really did not know what to expect. I did know that we were purposely going to leave out the “none of the above” option. We weren’t sure how that omission would be received (or if it would even be noticed).

A comment was posted that most likely echoed the concerns of those who’d chosen not to participate (also making us aware of the fact that people did notice the omission). The dialogue that followed confirmed that the best thing that we could do is to encourage others to not only get involved in the process, but to make sure that we do our part to help people decide who their choice for the mayor’s job is.

We are going to take a stance that may surprise some as a result: we’re not going to endorse any candidate in the upcoming mayoral elections.

What we are going to do is provide those that visit The Terminal with as much information as possible to allow those living in the city limits the opportunity to make an informed decision come October (and November if necessary). This will hopefully include interviews and/or profiles with the candidates and looking at some of the issues that you will hopefully identify as important in the coming days.

Everyone is waiting for the leader to emerge, someone that can guide Birmingham where it needs to go. If you think of it in those terms, you may never quite find the ideal person, though you may find someone that can do their part and use their ideals to make Birmingham and most of central Alabama better. This is one of those times where waiting may lead some voters to sit it out. Maybe it should not be a question of leadership but of stewardship before us in October.
I invite any candidate running for mayor to contact me at andre@bhamterminal.com so that we can begin this process.

We also hope to include any opportunities to register to vote on the Timetable calendar in the coming months.

The history of low voter turnout locally in recent years is well documented and maybe helping to get the word out about registration opportunities and helping to encourage people to do so early will help in some way.

Birmingham has been referred to by some as “The City of Perpetual Promise”. This upcoming election in October is essentially about who takes the reins of the city’s future to guide it so that its “promise” becomes its reality.

The ironic thing is that the city and its surrounding area are enjoying a period of growth and excitement, despite some not wanting to believe it. That’s one of the reasons we try to show the promise and growth every week in our corner of the blogosphere.

I’m not quite sure what some of our decisions will get us labeled; people are constantly trying to assign labels to things in hopes that it will make things easier. I’m hoping for “interesting” myself.

Cheers.

André Natta is the managing editor of The Terminal. You can reach him at andre@bhamterminal.com.

Your thoughts on the Siegelman & Scrushy sentences

My Birmingham is actually about your Birmingham; what your thoughts and opinions are on issues affecting the city and the greater metropolitan area. This particular story also seems to have captured the interest of the state and the country.

So, let’s hear from you: What do you think about last night’s sentences?

Don’t forget to vote on the front page, but we’d like to see some of your thoughts.

We’re looking forward to the responses.

BTW: If you have an idea for a My Birmingham question, send them in to info@bhamterminal.com.

Droughts can teach us unexpected lessons

I was two years old when the 1977 New York City blackout added the extra burden of climbing 16 flights of stairs onto an already sweltering heat wave. My parents can still recall scenes of looting and mayhem as they were trying to get home from grocery shopping. The power apparently went while we were out. I’m still wondering how I handled the stairs. We also had one of several water emergencies that plagued the city during the late 70s and early 80s.

Crime spiked during both of those events; it’s an unfortunate result of hot weather. You’d think that people would stay indoors and hide out in air conditioning to avoid the heat. Instead, they’re trying to break into businesses and homes, holding up residents throughout the city and turning to more fatal activities due to what all call “boredom”.

A quick scan of Myspace bulletins and other news sites over the last 3-4 days would tell you that the issue is reaching a boiling point among residents and property owners, particularly in areas where people are just joining the urban fabric that is the city center.

In a city as defined by the single-family home as Birmingham is, enforcement of the water emergency may be what’s needed. Now that of course sounds crazy. But it is something to consider.

Every elected official interviewed about the emergency, no matter what city they’re in, says that officers will be responding to complaints instead of purposefully seeking out perpetrators. That being said, if officers are conducting their normal patrols of beats with the added awareness required to spot people watering illegally, they may in fact notice things that are not supposed to be going on that are more in line with what people expect officers to do nowadays.

Part of the problem is that people are quite willing to turn in a neighbor for running the sprinkler on the wrong day of the week yet they are scared to call the police if something more sinister or severe is going on. Perhaps we can take this time to practice how to call when we see someone or something suspicious happening in the future.

Water emergencies tend to make people claim ownership of their city and take control of the situation. If people are concerned about what officers will be responding to, make sure that they’re responding to a necessary call. You can always call 311 and report the water violation and save 911 for things like robberies and muggings.

It also does not make sense for people in the neighborhoods to turn a blind eye to the issue and simply state that it is normal. There are many things that some tend to accept because they’ve "gotten used to it"; no one should ever get used to crime or any other annoyance in their community. No, urban living is not just how they make it look like on television, (meaning don’t expect utopia; it is a city after all), however there are certain things pertaining to quality of life that should be expected and available. That includes not worrying about sitting out on your porch or being able to walk through your own neighborhood with friends. It is still the city though, and some caution should be taken.

The region is facing a problem if they do not begin to curtail water usage, however it may face a larger problem if people bored during the summer heat begin to start using live walking targets for shooting practice. As stewards to our region, we must consider just what must be done to provide us with a proper quality of life. We do elect our officials to take care of many of these problems, but perhaps every once in a while, a water emergency reminds us that we have to do our part to take care of it as well.

Let us know what you think.

André Natta is the managing editor of The Terminal. You can reach him at andre@bhamterminal.com.

If you’re interested in submitting a piece to My Birmingham, check out the submission guidelines and send it in to info@bhamterminal.com.

City Stages 2007: Some thoughts for the future

George McMillan walked out onto the Legacy Credit Union Stage on Saturday evening just before Dr. John was ready to take the stage. McMillan incidentally decided that he would be at this stage for most of the festival; while he did move, he was rarely ventured that far away.

He did not introduce himself (though most in the crowd knew who he was) but went on to say something that many did not expect and some began to talk about immediately. He said that he had not taken the mic at this stage since it had been moved a few years ago during the revamp of the festival site. He went on to thank the crowd personally saying "we know that without you, the supporters of the singer-songwriter stage, there would be no City Stages." That comment was met with applause, but also some questions. The guy standing next to me asked if McMillan believed it so much then why wasn’t he buying everyone at the stage a drink.

That statement is one that is interesting. I’ve never seen crowds on a Sunday afternoon at the festival like the ones I saw at the Legacy and Coke Classic stages. The first thought was that "they may have finally figured it out". The festival has been more about the ability to see emerging acts than it’s been about big name top tier acts taking the stage for the masses.

That’s perhaps the best piece of advice that I can offer this festival. I figured I’d throw my two cents worth in since everyone else has or plans to do so. Despite the apparent success that City Stages enjoyed this year, there’s always room for improvement. The day that this festival tries to become Bonnaroo then it will be DOA and those that predicted its demise will still be somewhat upset, since many of them truly do not want to see it go.

There are some things that can be done to create the positive buzz that Chuck Geiss eluded to in his Naked Birmingham submission last month. Among them:

Find new ways to make people aware of the music available. They have blatantly said that they are not trying to serve only one group (though some groups will be easier to serve than others), but times have changed. The first year I attended, as I drove into town, there were three different stations doing live remotes from the CS site. While that would in fact be the ideal situation, the current terrestrial radio landscape makes it a little different. Stations still plug the festival, but maybe in this modern age of iPods and Myspace profiles, the music should be brought to the masses. Provide links to artists’ Myspace pages, provide downloadable podcasts of musical acts on a weekly basis through other sites than just the official site. It’s also fairly cheap to burn CDs nowadays. One sponsorship of a CD that could be mass-produced and distributed for free all over town. The logistics are probably the one holdup but there should be enough acts that would agree to it that it could work.

One of the reasons that people thought there were more headliners was because there were more opportunities to be familiar with the music before the gates opened on Friday night. Find ways to get that feeling back.

Investigate breaking the festival out of the box. I will begin this one by saying that I have never been able to attend SXSW. It’s on that list of things that I need to do soon, before the opportunity escapes. I am familiar with the energy of those types of festivals though, and finding ways to expand the sphere of activity would be an incredible asset to City Stages.

Mary Carluso eluded to this idea in her list of opinions last week, but the idea of including venues and bars in the festival may just provide the additional buzz that’s needed. It may even be possible to create a secondary festival that allows CS to feed off of it. There would be a lot of things that would have to go right in order to do it, including improving transportation options for at
the very least during the event as well as a partnership among area bars and clubs. But imagine seeing bands at Bottletree, Westside Lounge, Speakeasy and Metro Bistro, not to mention countless other venues. You could even get some of the larger venues in the downtown area in on the act like the Alabama & Carver Theatres & the Boutwell Auditorium. The possibilities are endless. Allow for people who buy one ticket to get the other one for a discount or offer a joint ticket. For those that see it as a citywide cultural event, this is one way to truly involve the entire city.

Move the date to the end of summer. I am aware of the fact that moving the event from Father’s Day weekend has been ruled out by McMillan. The ability to become the official end of summer concert event just may enough to meet City Stages’ tagline as a world class music festival. The guys who head up Bonnaroo are never going to move theirs (and they did put that 150-mile radius/60 day clause in there for a reason. The next best thing to do is to move it and make it a destination event, if that’s truly what you want it to be.

Run it like a for profit. Even if you don’t want to become a for-profit, the idea of running it like one is a principle that many non-profits embrace. I was lucky enough to work for two people that embraced that philosophy and it benefited those organizations tremendously to date. It’s something to consider.

Those are my ideas. I’m hopeful that they’ll listen and consider, even with the obstacles that present themselves with each one. They seem to be starting to dig out though, so they may just keep doing what they’re doing. Hopefully though, the dialogue will continue for some time to come.

What are your thoughts? Post them down below.

André Natta is the publisher of The Terminal. You can reach him directly at andre@bhamterminal.com.