<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Fox 6 have shown Osbournes Reloaded last night?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bhamterminal.com/mcq/2009/04/01/osbournes-reloaded-airing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bhamterminal.com/mcq/2009/04/01/osbournes-reloaded-airing/</link>
	<description>Question for Birmingham from The Terminal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 02:17:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Self</title>
		<link>http://bhamterminal.com/mcq/2009/04/01/osbournes-reloaded-airing/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Self</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhamterminal.com/mcq/?p=124#comment-492</guid>
		<description>But should they have... pretty horrible show IMHO. And definitely not &quot;family friendly&quot;. Nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But should they have&#8230; pretty horrible show IMHO. And definitely not &#8220;family friendly&#8221;. Nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trav</title>
		<link>http://bhamterminal.com/mcq/2009/04/01/osbournes-reloaded-airing/comment-page-1/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>trav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhamterminal.com/mcq/?p=124#comment-490</guid>
		<description>Anyone in charge of any media gets the final call when it comes to publishing, broadcasting, etc. as it should be. If the local Fox folks gathered over beers and decided that their market here in the heart of Alabama would appreciate them not airing that content after what Fox calls a &quot;family friendly American Idol&quot;, then they can and should. If it&#039;s what they really think their customers wanted. 

But it seems that many times highly-paid media big wigs aren&#039;t as in-touch with their customers/viewers as they think they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone in charge of any media gets the final call when it comes to publishing, broadcasting, etc. as it should be. If the local Fox folks gathered over beers and decided that their market here in the heart of Alabama would appreciate them not airing that content after what Fox calls a &#8220;family friendly American Idol&#8221;, then they can and should. If it&#8217;s what they really think their customers wanted. </p>
<p>But it seems that many times highly-paid media big wigs aren&#8217;t as in-touch with their customers/viewers as they think they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://bhamterminal.com/mcq/2009/04/01/osbournes-reloaded-airing/comment-page-1/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhamterminal.com/mcq/?p=124#comment-489</guid>
		<description>I agree with Wade.  I&#039;m fine with an affiliate not airing a certain program if it doesn&#039;t fit into their market, but to make that decision before the market has a chance to form an opinion probably wasn&#039;t the best move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Wade.  I&#8217;m fine with an affiliate not airing a certain program if it doesn&#8217;t fit into their market, but to make that decision before the market has a chance to form an opinion probably wasn&#8217;t the best move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade</title>
		<link>http://bhamterminal.com/mcq/2009/04/01/osbournes-reloaded-airing/comment-page-1/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bhamterminal.com/mcq/?p=124#comment-488</guid>
		<description>Every affiliate has the right to refuse to air network programs, provided it has a reason. However, what is Fox 6&#039;s reason?

Otherwise, the default should be to air it and let the audience decide, kinda like the show that would&#039;ve lead into the Osbournes&#039; show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every affiliate has the right to refuse to air network programs, provided it has a reason. However, what is Fox 6&#8242;s reason?</p>
<p>Otherwise, the default should be to air it and let the audience decide, kinda like the show that would&#8217;ve lead into the Osbournes&#8217; show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
